|
 |
   |
|
Drinking water trademark infringement case of Guangdong two review to open court session
provenance:Original  Date
Added:2002-05-04
" Kemulang" fights again" benefit life spring"
Yesterday, benefit life spring purified water limited company of Guangzhou again with register a source industry limited company of Guangzhou City confrontation of evidence at court of" Kemulang" trademark, in court review,
Since is the focus that the place name is"s Kemulang" of the trademark again and can use to become the both parties to argue literally.
On May 24 in this year, a judgment in the hospital definitely thinks in Guangzhou, a source industry limited company of the plaintiff Guangzhou City is a registration person who registers the trademark" Kemulang", the accused is wide
The state benefit life spring purified water limited company has not yet the plaintiff permission, pack, paying the over-wrap of pack the purified water at the bottle that it make, sell without authorization up use respectively" Kemulang benefit
The life spring" be the product name with" the benefit life spring", its behavior has already infringed upon the registration trademark appropriation power of the plaintiff, judging to compensate the plaintiff economy to lose 300,000 dollars by law.
" The benefit life spring" appeals against verdict to bring up the resort.
|
|